I have talked with a number of atheists who
really believe in and use the following argument to disprove religion/God. They will say:
Look, there are
literally thousands of religions. The
very fact that all these exist, PROVES they are all false!
Now this is actually a direct quote from
someone on Twitter who is well followed and re-tweeted often. Clearly this Twitter user’s opinion is
respected. I asked him to explain why
he thought that the existence of multiple religions proved they were all
wrong. His response:
Reality isn’t subjective. If there was any reality to one particular religion
it would be unanimously accepted.
There are a couple of claims here so I will
treat each, one at a time.
Reality isn’t subjective.
– Of course this is correct. A claim about reality is either true, or it
is not true. Either Christianity is
true, or it is not true. It can’t be
true for me, but not for someone else.
That is not logical.
If there was any
reality to one particular religion it would be unanimously accepted. – Is this really true? Does something need to be unanimously
accepted in order to be true? I really
don’t think an atheist would want to argue this way because it puts him in a
difficult spot. Here’s what I mean: If something needs to be unanimously accepted
to be true, then atheism cannot be true, since not only is atheism NOT
unanimously accepted, but it is the minority opinion. If you apply the claim to itself, all of a sudden the atheist has no footing for
their own beliefs. This is not a good
argument against the reality of anything.
Universal acceptance of a truth is not required for something to be
true.
The very fact that
all these [religions] exist, PROVES they are all false. – Its clear that
the existence of competing views of reality cannot mean that they are ALL
false. All religions COULD be false but by no means does it prove that they are.
The existence of multiple religions doesn't mean that all of them are automatically false. You'd be very hard-pushed to find someone who would say something so stupid.
ReplyDeleteWhat the existence of all these religions does show is that, even if one of them does happen to be the truth, people certainly tend to invent superstitions to explain what their knowledge cannot, and the vast majority of these superstitions are false.
When AT LEAST 99% of religions are complete fabrications, your own particular brand has to provide some pretty solid proof of its veracity unless it is to fall very foul of Occam's razor. No religion on the planet does that.
Yeah, that's really kind of an intuitive/emotional kind of appeal. More empty rhetoric from the guardians of reason.
ReplyDelete